Author: Phil Fiore

Diana Britton | Jul 22, 2024

While many in the financial advice business have for years focused on retail clients, some firms are finding that institutional clients, such as pensions and foundations, can pay off in a major way.

When advisor Phil Fiore started his career at Prudential Securities in the 1990s, the most common way to build a book of business was to “dial for dollars,” cold-calling complete strangers hoping to convince them to hand over their assets and invest in the latest preferred stock.

“How many times am I going to do that? How many times you get punched in the face?” he said.

He had a better idea—if he could land a client with a larger pool of assets, say, a retirement plan, he could access the people within that pool. A $20 million retirement plan client, for instance, could provide 200 participants as warm leads for his private wealth business.

Fiore has followed that thesis for three decades and now leads Procyon Partners, a Dynasty Financial Partners-backed registered investment advisor with $7 billion in total assets, about $4.5 billion of which are institutional.

To be sure, the wirehouses

have been building their institutional consulting businesses for many years. In fact, Fiore built one of the biggest institutional consulting groups at Merrill Lynch and then UBS before going independent. Morgan Stanley’s Graystone Consulting has roots dating back to 1973 and is still going strong.

There have been some early adopters in the RIA space, such as Captrust, which oversees more than $800 billion in assets, and SageView Advisory Group, which advises on over 1,900 defined contribution, defined benefit and deferred compensation plans.

However, many in the RIA business are only now beginning to discover Fiore’s premis for themselves and making concerted efforts to serve the institutional market.

One of the biggest RIAs in the country, Mariner Wealth Advisors, acquired two institutional consulting firms, AndCo Consulting and Fourth Street Performance Partners, in early February, adding $104 billion in assets and 100 employees. The two firms will combine to form the foundation for Mariner Institutional. Mariner’s existing retirement plan services team, which manages about $5 billion in defined contribution assets, will also be rolled up into that new vertical.

Marty Bicknell, president and CEO of Mariner, said his firm’s M&A strategy is primarily about talent acquisition, and the institutional expertise was “a gaping hole in our offering.” However, this new development also gives Mariner advisors access to the participants of those institutions to help them plan for retirement, he said.

“The institutional consultant very frequently will get asked, ‘Is what you’re doing available to me, or is it available to any of the participants that might be on the retirement side?’” Bicknell said. “And from AndCo’s perspective, they always had to answer ‘no,’ because they did not have a wealth offering. And so this gives us the ability for them to respond ‘yes.’”

But these are still only the initial stages of what will likely be a growing trend of RIA firms looking to connect institutional businesses with retail wealth management firms, said Lew Minsky, president and CEO of the Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association.

“I think we’re at the early days of this next level trend, which is RIA aggregators purely in the wealth management side saying, ‘Well, having a connection to the retirement side, that institutional market can be a valuable way for us to diversify our business and create a pipeline into the wealth management business as well,’” he said.

The Next Wave

While Captrust has a history in the retirement plan space, the RIA has recently acquired more traditional institutional consulting firms that serve defined benefit plans, endowments and foundations. In 2022, it picked up Portfolio Evaluations Inc., a Warren, N.J.–based firm with more than $107 billion in assets and several hundred clients. In February 2021, it added Cammack Retirement Group, with $154 billion in assets under advisement, and in August 2021, it acquired Ellwood Associates, with $85 billion in AUA.

Creative Planning’s acquisition in 2021 of the retirement plan business of Lockton, an independent insurance brokerage, which added $110 billion to the RIA’s assets, is another example.

Minsky said one factor driving the latest wave into the institutional space is the recognition that the retirement plan and wealth management businesses complement each other.

“You can get a pretty significant pipeline of potential wealth management clients through the institutional plan relationships and at a relatively low cost, and then potentially create through that pipeline, create higher margin wealth management business and ultimately create enterprise value,” he said.

This is a sentiment echoed by Fiore.

“Some of the current people that are coming in are just looking at the outright demographics and saying, ‘Hey, there’s going to be a load of money retiring in the next half a decade to a decade,’” Fiore said. “The best way to get in there is to have been doing the work on the 401(k) to begin with, and that will provide the ultimate entrée, I believe.”

Dick Darian, founding partner of Wise Rhino Group, which provides M&A advisory services for firms focused on the retirement and wealth advisory space, said wealth advisors used to go after individuals’ 401(k) rollovers, but a lot of those rollovers aren’t happening at the pace they used to. Either folks are leaving money in plans because it’s cheaper than having an advisor manage it, or the Captrusts of the world are getting to the participants first through the c-suite relationships, he said.

“If you are already in the c-suite, and you’re providing institutional retirement consulting to a company—defined as you’re helping companies design their plans, administer their plans, invest the money, communicate with employees—you’ve already got one foot in the door,” Darian said. “You might as well kind of keep going and begin to figure out how do I engage the employees and participants in these companies in a way that I can begin to have wealth conversations with them?”

That’s essentially what RIAs like Captrust, Mariner and Creative Planning are hoping to do. But these firms are using more sophisticated approaches to “worksite engagement,” Darian said.

Fiore said he’s not just going into a boardroom and talking shop with the board of trustees of the retirement plan. Instead, his team engages onsite with participants via group meetings or webinars.

“We’re active in the demographics of the participants, and I think that’s why we’ve been so successful at that,” he said.

In addition to engaging participants, Bicknell said the acquisitions of AndCo and Fourth Street Performance Partners provided an opportunity to bring the new services to Mariner’s existing retirement plan clients. In fact, they already have 900 institutional clients.

Darian said Mariner’s existing retirement plans clients typically have $20 million and 500 participants on average, whereas AndCo is working with much larger plans.

“Marty could be thinking, ‘Well, look, that service could be migrated down market so we can provide a better product for smaller plans because now we have a more sophisticated firm that’s providing services in a different segment,’” Darian said.

Evolution of Traditional Consulting

Beacon Pointe was another RIA early to the institutional game. In fact, the firm started as an institutional consulting business when it lifted out a team from Canterbury Consulting in 2002. It had about $1 billion in AUA at the time, with a small base of private clients. The firm has about $6 billion in institutional business. Its retail business grew rapidly from the beginning.

The RIA went in reverse order than the industry has trended, building its wealth management business off the back of its institutional business. But Mike Breller, managing director, institutional consulting at Beacon Pointe, said the evolution of traditional consulting has driven more RIAs into the business, and in particular, the rise of the OCIO (outsourced CIO) model.

That model has allowed advisors to move from non-discretionary to discretionary management, a more scalable and higher-fee model.

Under the traditional consulting model, the consultant would advise the institution’s committee on recommendations for the portfolio, and when the consultant leaves, the committee would have to vote on those changes to approve them, Breller said. Then, the executives would have to go to their custodian and execute on those trades themselves. They only meet on a quarterly basis.

Under the OCIO model, the handcuffs are off, and the consultant has the discretion to make changes to the portfolio and execute those trades as ideas come up.

“This OCIO business segment represents a really large and fast-growing portion of every institutional opportunity that’s out there,” Breller said. “Being able to scale this institutional business that’s now set on OCIO model portfolios based on higher fees than the traditional consulting model, that’s more attractive for larger RIAs and wealth management firms today than it was in the old model.”

Breller said he’s now able to build a service offering that can be used by Beacon Pointe’s wealth advisors across the country. Because the firm has discretion, its portfolio management decisions are all centralized, so advisors, whether they have that institutional background or not, can add that distribution channel.

“If it’s $100 million and you’re in New Jersey, you’re probably going to refer it to our group and we’ll do it all. If it’s $10 million and it’s in New Jersey, that group now has all of our back-end potential to market, close, manage the portfolio. All you have to do is service it,” he said.

Build, Buy or Lease?

While some firms, like Procyon and Beacon Pointe, have chosen to build an institutional business themselves, it can be difficult to do so from scratch, given the long sales cycle. The quickest way is to buy into the space.

In fact, Wise Rhino has made about 150 deals over the last five years, and almost all of them have helped retirement advisory businesses sell to retirement and wealth aggregators. That activity has been driven by buyers coming in with massive private equity money looking to expand or by sellers looking for a succession plan, Darian said.

In 2010, his firm was doing five to 10 deals a year in the retirement plan space; it started to boom in 2018, 2019, and 2020, and by 2021, those accounted for over 75 of 252 total RIA transactions.

Once the deals close, Mariner Institutional will have 40 institutional consultants, and Bicknell wants to double over the next three years through a combination of acquisitions and traditional recruiting.

Breller said Beacon Pointe is also exploring acquisitions of one or more institutional OCIO businesses to expand its expertise in that area further.

Another way to enter the space is to lease or outsource the work to someone who specializes in it. In fact, Procyon offers just that, where advisors can white-label its “Total Benefits Solution.” Procyon’s consultants do the work behind the scenes, administering the plan and executing the portfolio, while the RIA manages the relationship with the client. The firm currently has five individual RIAs and two large institutions it serves with that model.

“You’re literally marrying another entity that you may not have married from the beginning,” says CEO of Procyon Partners.

July 5, 2024

By Gregg Greenberg

Partnering with another RIA means more than merely hooking up, according to Phil Fiore, CEO of Procyon Partners. It’s essentially a wedding between wealth managers.

“You’re literally marrying another entity that you may not have married from the beginning,” said Fiore. “This is a whole new change as to how the firm works and what the direction will be.”

And like any marriage, it could head in the wrong direction – and quickly – if those partners enter into the arrangement for the wrong reasons, or without being forthright from the very beginning.

Fiore and four partners launched Procyon in 2017 with $2B in AUM in a single Shelton, Connecticut office. Today they manage $7B across six offices and have a team of 50 employees.

Finding the right partner, one that fills respective voids, takes time, says Fiore. In his view, getting the culture correct upfront is far more important than finding someone that will expeditiously cut a check.

“The ones that went wrong in the aggregate are the ones that were not culturally aligned,” said Fiore. “I’ve been independent for seven years, but in the seven years that we’ve done this, the successful ones are those that really understand where the partner fits, and the people that just go about it relative to a check, well, I usually see those unwind.”

So with all that in mind, what should one look for before saying ‘I do’ at the RIA altar?

The number one thing, says Fiore, is making sure the potential partner is organically growing year over year. And more than that, the ability to prove it when opening the books. Number two, if a firm has grown through M&A, then one needs to make sure those tuck-ins are accretive and profitable.

“And at the end of the day, you want to know if the business is run profitably according to EBITA,” said Fiore.

The alternative to partnering up for growth of course is selling out. And in the current market there is no shortage of large suitors backed with stacks of private equity cash seeking yet another roll-up.

As enticing as it sounds, don’t simply go for green, says Fiore.

“From a sales standpoint, you have to reconcile in your mind that what you built cannot continue in the way it has without some larger entity rebranding and refocusing the efforts there,” said Fiore.

And don’t forget about the clients either, whether the growth path is via partnership or sale.

“I think irrespective of whether or not you sell-out in the aggregate or partner up, the firm needs to align with you culturally. It needs to align with how you treat your clients,” said Fiore. “If you align with someone that’s worried about profits and just profits, and cutting, cutting, cutting, that’s a misalignment. You’ve got to spend a lot of time again being patient, making sure that the values align.

Growth isn’t a linear, smooth path – it’s filled with multiple challenges as a firm proceeds through stages. Navigating the ship of business requires different approaches from advisory firms that recently launched, those that have reached their final intended heights, and those in between.

We reached out to three CEOs of advisory businesses – at early, middle and fully achieved stages of growth – that are affiliated with Dynasty Financial Partners: Matt Liebman, Founding Partner, CEO and Wealth Advisor at Amplius Wealth Advisors; Phil Fiore, Co-Founder, Partner, Executive Managing Director and CEO of Procyon Partners; and Michael Lehman, CEO and Founding Partner of Premier Path Wealth Partners.

We asked each of them about the challenges, strategies, insights and experiences of their stage of growth. Our questions and their answers follow.

Procyon takes a bottom-up approach to portfolio management, but the firm’s real differentiator lies in its own alternative funds, giving clients access to unique opportunities in the private markets.

Diana Britton | Apr 08, 2024

Procyon Partners was founded in 2017 by financial advisor Phil Fiore with the support of Dynasty Financial Partners. Fiore previously built one of the most prominent institutional consulting groups at Merrill Lynch and then UBS before going independent. And while much of the RIA’s $7 billion business is now private wealth, the institutional DNA still runs through it.

That includes the RIA’s portfolio management process. The firm’s proxy model portfolio, explained below, consists of a 20% allocation to alternatives, which some may consider high for a retail wealth management firm. And that allocation is not through an alternative platform, such as iCapital or CAIS, but via Procyon’s proprietary funds.

Antonio Rodrigues, partner and chief investment officer at Procyon, provides a peek inside the RIA’s 50/30/20 model portfolio.

The following has been edited for length and clarity.

WealthManagement.com: What’s in your model portfolio?

Antonio Rodrigues: If you’re going to compare what we’re doing to a normal 60/40 portfolio, we would say it’s going to be 50% equity, 30% fixed, and 20% in alternatives.

We’re utilizing mostly passive strategies in our equity bucket, individual ETFs for the most part on the equity side, whether it’s large cap, small, mid, international or emerging markets. And then we’ll also use some thematic ETFs like cybersecurity oil. We were buying some energy-related specific ETFs towards the bottom of 2020 and held them for a couple of years.

On the fixed-income side, we’re using active managers, and we’re trying to keep our duration close to the benchmark.

And for alternatives, we’re mainly using our two funds if the client qualifies. If they don’t qualify, then we will use only one of our private funds that they can qualify for and will find an alternative, maybe a 40 Act fund, as a proxy for our fund.

WM.com: What’s in the equity and bond buckets, and what’s driving those allocations?

AR: What drives the allocations is going to mainly be our macro investment committee voting members. Each quarter, we have a survey of all the members of the committee. We weigh the answers, and we act accordingly. And we essentially ask them, “If you’re 60/40 or whatever the target is, what are your tactical weightings? And here were the weightings last time, and here are how you would answer it today.”

We use benchmarking in order to gauge our success. On the equity side, 75% of our benchmark is the Russell 3000, and 25% is the ACWI-ex-U.S.

On the fixed side, it’s just the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index. And on the private side, there’s no real benchmark there. That’s more manager-by-manager.

We will often substitute or enhance our equity or fixed-income targets with individual securities or SMAs. We do have a series of in-house managed equity portfolios and own several SMA managers across the firm for both stocks and fixed income.

WM.com: Have you made any allocation changes in the last six months to a year?

AR: About a year ago, we had an overweight to China, and we exited that overweight as we saw that their reopening did not occur. We’re market-weight or neutral on emerging markets right now. We also have added a little bit to small-cap and to developed international simply because the expected return of diversion from the mean has been so dramatic. In public equities, typically, that’s going to revert to the mean versus the U.S.

When it comes to holdings themselves, we’re using Vanguard, Schwab ETFs. We’ve got 23% in growth. We’ve got 20% just in large cap blend. We’re using the Capital Group Dividend Value ETF at 7%. We’ve got a 5% position in the NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF. We’ve also added to the Pacer U.S. Cash Cows 100 ETF. We’ve gotten out of small-cap value over the last year. We’ve added back to small-cap growth with the Pacer U.S. Small Cap Cash Cows ETF as well.

We are of the mindset that there was always going to be three rate cuts this year because we tend to believe the Fed. We think if those cuts occur, we’re going to get a greater beta out of the growth side versus the value side. So far, it hasn’t been priced in that that will occur, but we’re keeping an eye on it as some of the leadership is changing in the market.

On the fixed income side, we have moved closer to duration. We’ve essentially exited most of our cash positions that we would’ve held over the last two years. We were overweight cash; now we’re back to market weight when it comes to fixed income. On the duration side, we’ve been short for a long, long time. We’re moving closer to neutral duration. But by and large, we have active managers in there, so we don’t want to over-manage the managers either. We’re tactical where we need to be on a macro basis, but we give the managers there a lot of leeway.

WM.com: How are your private funds structured, and what do they invest in?

AR: We launched two flavors: One is a vintage drawdown series, so that’s Procyon Vintage I. Inside of that is all private equity and venture capital. We have funded three managers so far and looking to fund a fourth manager that was launched in July of last year. We are charging no management fee and no carry for current Procyon clients to invest in there. We get the same revenue whether you own shares of Apple or a treasury bond or you own a Procyon fund. We wanted to be true fiduciaries, and we wanted to make sure we didn’t have just a single source solution. So we’ve put together a couple of parties that are all independent of each other to create those funds and deliver them.

The evergreen structure was launched in the fourth quarter of last year. It is a 307C fund, whereby all the investments inside the evergreen structure are going to be hedge-funded in private credit and a little bit of GP. We’ve identified six managers there, and we’re looking to fund all of them by the end of April. The target minimum raise is $25 million. So once we get to the $25 million, we’re able to deploy all that capital for accredited investors. Even though the underlying investments are QP only, they’re very high minimums, $5 and $10 million minimums. Again, we take no carry nor management fee for Procyon clients. We are developing a share class whereby we can allow other RIAs to invest for a small management fee attached to it.

WM.com: How is the first fund you mentioned, Procyon Vintage I, structured?

AR: It’s a feeder fund, and that one is likely going to close at the end of this year. We’re going to close that fund once we fund it, and that’ll have a 10-year lockup for investors, and those are QP-only investments.

WM.com: How are you getting access to these private equity managers?

AR: We’ve got a big network within the firm of advisors and people that have worked in the industry for a while, so we have a lot of inputs there. There are a lot of people who are knocking on our door to get into the funds and be a part of our platform. We didn’t want to use iCapital or CAIS to source the funds because if we could get them on the platform, then we wouldn’t create our own feeder. We would essentially just buy them on the platform. So we hired a firm owned by F.L. Putnam, Atrato Consulting. Atrato’s sole focus is to do due diligence and source new managers. They have sourced the majority of the managers there. We gave them the criteria of the management we were looking for, which are high minimums, off-platform, and hard to access, and that’s what they found us.

We’re looking at a diversified basket of managers. So what’ll happen is, in the vintage fund, investors will commit capital, and if there’s enough there to fund another manager, then we will fund that manager. And then it’s a drawdown structure. Each of the managers will have their own capital calls on the fund. So each of the commitments will get funded little by little over the course of one to two years. And then what will happen is there’ll start to be some distributions, and that may be sort of self-funding going forward.

WM.com: What differentiates your portfolio?

AR: On the public equity side, we’re delivering low-cost, tax-efficient, tactical, and thematic. We have a top-down understanding of the economy. We have a bottom-up understanding of the portfolio, and we run it that way. But it’s very hard to differentiate on that these days. You want to make sure people have access to public markets in an efficient way. So what we’re really trying to do is find access to managers that are hard to access.

We’re looking for funds that may be closed, but willing to accept some interesting new deposits or new clients. We’re doing a lot of work on the alternative side because that’s where most of the work belongs. It’s very difficult to identify good managers on the alternative side, so we’re delivering a ton of value there. And then we’re getting access. So we’re getting calls from people who have been investing with us now in alternatives, and they may have a co-invest opportunity for some unique clients. We’re working really hard on getting access to unique opportunities for all the clients.

WM.com: What’s your due diligence process for choosing asset managers and funds?

AR: We have a small group within our walls called the Manager Research Group. It’s a committee whose job is to run all the due diligence on all the managers, and it was born a couple of years ago. We took Procyon’s institutional due diligence process because we have several billion in institutional funds, 401(k)s and pensions. We took that due diligence process and overlayed the private wealth prism on it. In institutional due diligence, it’s all about meeting metrics—backward-looking. In private wealth, it’s all about what the expected return is going to be. And so we took those two things and built them together and created our manager research group. They meet on a monthly basis.

We look at about 11 different pillars. A lot of that has to do with manager tenure, fees, who owns the fund, how much is in the fund distribution, potential distributions, and then you have peer group rankings and so forth. They all have to be within the top two quartiles of all the data in order to be considered a good fund.

For private, it’s vastly different. The data is not readily available to look at the market as a whole easily. We wind up having to go manager by manager; we have a voting group made up of the main members of the main committee, and we get managers lined up, they get proposed, and we do the research, and we vote them in or out.

WM.com: What’s the opportunity you see in investing in alternatives?

AR: You’re supposed to be fully diversified in a portfolio. Now if you’re not an accredited investor or higher, it’s difficult to get access to these kinds of things, number one. So there are barriers in place for a reason, and so we adhere to those. But what ends up happening is once you become accredited and qualified, then all new doors open up, and that’s the way it’s built. What winds up happening is there’s this big demand in the private markets because the public markets have become so much less diversified.

On top of that, nowadays, you can structure investments in alternatives with much better liquidity structures than you would have been able to 10 years ago. The evergreen structure would’ve been more difficult. We do believe there’s a premium to be earned when you have less liquidity, so we want to capture that for the clients. To clients and even to some professionals, the public markets more and more look “rigged,” and people don’t trust them as much.

WM.com: Do you have any interest in bitcoin ETFs or getting into the crypto markets at all?

AR: We’ve entered the crypto markets on a non-discretionary basis over the last several years. As the demand came up for us internally, we wanted to provide the right solution as opposed to referring everyone. So we partnered with a company called Eaglebrook Advisors, and essentially we hold everything in cold storage. And now with the advent of the ETF and the size and the scope of them, it becomes more of a tactical decision.

We have approved on our recommended list, one bitcoin ETF. Essentially to us, a bitcoin ETF as it’s structured today is just all about what the fees are because they should all have very low tracking errors and so forth. But we have not made an active decision to allocate to bitcoin, and if we do, that would be in the alternatives portion of the portfolio.

Three Experienced Dynasty-Affiliated Firm Leaders Share Keys To Ensuring Successful Acquisitions

Acquisitions aren’t just for RIA aggregators and large enterprises – small and mid-sized advisory businesses often choose to grow inorganically. While the scaled, repeat players have teams of experts with years of experience and playbooks for multiple strategies, less experienced firms may encounter difficulty evaluating an acquisition opportunity and, once they decide to enter the arena, knowing how to make one proceed smoothly.

To learn the keys to successful acquisitions for advisory business leaders, we reached out to Dynasty Financial Partners affiliates who lead advisory firms and have successfully completed acquisitions: Mike Quin, Partner and CEO, DayMark Wealth Partners; Phil Fiore, Jr., CEO, Executive Managing Director and Founding Partner, Procyon Partners; and Ronald E. Thacker, Managing Partner and President, Americana Partners.

We asked each of them: For advisory business leaders looking to acquire another firm, what are three important issues that may appear small but can make a large difference in a successful acquisition?

Their responses follow.

Mike Quin, Partner And CEO, DayMark Wealth Partners

Mike Quin, Partner & CEO, DayMark Wealth Partners
Mike Quin, Partner & CEO, DayMark Wealth Partners

Three seemingly minor issues can make or break an acquisition for both the buyer and seller:

Cultural fit and philosophy: Financials often take precedence, but cultural compatibility is where I spend most of my time early in the M&A process. A misalignment in cultural values can lead to failure. Understanding culture will give insight into clients at the target firm. I often put the seller in social situations to observe behavior. An easy way to start this process is to watch how they interact with staff at a restaurant. If they are courteous to people they don’t know, who are there to serve them a meal, chances are that attitude will carry over into their organization. People matter.

Talent retention: The real assets of businesses in our space ride up and down the elevators every day. Recognizing and retaining key employees, especially as they relate to the overall goal of the acquisition (growing the business or succession are good examples) is another issue that makes a huge difference in a successful acquisition. People matter.

Transition planning: Often the actual transition is discussed but not planned to capture every detail. A quick, efficient transition is an opportunity to show clients what is in it for them. Our partners at Dynasty execute this, in concert with DayMark, at a high level. This client experience should blow away expectations. Details matter.

In the RIA arena of acquisitions, attention to these perceived minor issues can help position your firm for outsized growth and success.

Phil Fiore, Jr., CEO, Executive Managing Director And Founding Partner, Procyon Partners

Phil Fiore, Jr., CEO, Executive Managing Director & Founding Partner, Procyon Partners
Phil Fiore, Jr., CEO, Executive Managing Director & Founding Partner, Procyon Partners

For leaders in the advisory business considering acquiring another firm, three seemingly minor factors can significantly impact the success of the acquisition.

The alignment of culture stands paramount. An advisor from a lifestyle-oriented practice may struggle to integrate into a dynamic, high-octane environment like ours, for example. Embracing the firm’s mission is crucial – it may not resonate with everyone. Advisors skeptical of firm values might find themselves out of sync.

Business compatibility is another critical factor. An RIA focused on high net worth families but employing a starkly different business approach, such as trading stocks versus offering comprehensive planning and advisory services, could jeopardize a potentially fruitful partnership. Despite attractive initial figures and public relations benefits, a discordant business model can lead to long-term challenges.

Lastly, the transition should be mutually beneficial. An acquisition that favors only one party, failing to create shared value, is likely unsustainable. Our policy is to avoid engagements with advisors whose primary motive is the immediate financial gain rather than a long-term partnership. This approach isn’t about financial competitiveness but about fostering a community built on mutual respect, growth and shared success.

Ronald E. Thacker, Managing Partner And President, Americana Partners

Ronald E. Thacker, Managing Partner & President, Americana Partners
Ronald E. Thacker, Managing Partner & President, Americana Partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In any M&A transaction there are literally hundreds if not thousands of details to work through and consider, and some are clearly more critical than others.

When it comes to the success of an M&A opportunity, company culture is the top issue that makes or breaks the success of the deal. The parties involved in the deal may think they are not overlooking it, but its importance is often underestimated.

Everyone has an ego and that drives success in many situations, but individual egos can’t be so overbearing that it disrupts the harmony and cooperation within the existing firm. Not only do the business models of the firms joining need to line up but the personalities and egos involved also need to gel.

Also, the client must always be first and foremost, as a top priority. Growing a successful bottom line is clearly a mandate, but clients must never be made to feel that the firm’s interests come before their interests, and this ties back to the culture of the people in the firm that we are acquiring. All parties must have a “serve the client first”  attitude instead of a “make money for myself” attitude.

If the culture and people factors are positive and in alignment, all the details seem to fall into place without too many problems. If the culture and people factors are not positive, every detail feels like a hill to die on, and that’s when you know it’s time to cut bait and work on the next deal.

Michael Madden, Contributing Editor and Research Analyst at Wealth Solutions Report, can be reached at .

Procyon Partners has brought on Harry Kirkpatrick to serve as chief revenue officer.

Procyon Partners, the $6.5bn RIA backed by Dynasty Financial Partners, has hired a chief revenue officer, the firm revealed on Wednesday.

Harry Kirkpatrick is joining Procyon from NEIRG Wealth Management, where he’s served as chief operating officer since May 2023, according to his LinkedIn profile.

‘Over the course of my career, I have been proud to help financial advisors hone their skills and mature in the industry, so that they in turn can offer their clients superior service,’ Kirkpatrick stated. ‘I am excited to work with Phil and the team to design a development program to further enhance the talents and expand upon the services at Procyon.’

Procyon chief executive Phil Fiore told Citywire that Kirkpatrick’s primary responsibility will be working with the firm’s financial advisors to get the best out of them.

‘It’s no different than bringing in a trainer or coach for professional athletes,’ Fiore said. ‘I think of our financial advisors as professional athletes. Our skills have to continually be refined. They’re literally going to have an exec at the firm at their disposal to be able to spread their wings as far as they want to spread them.’

Prior to his time at NEIRG, Kirkpatrick spent six years at financial planning platform Facet, where he last served as chief revenue officer. He was also chief case designer at Pinnacle Financial Group from 2015 to 2017, his LinkedIn profile shows.

Employee-owned Procyon has been  affiliated with Dynasty since 2017. In 2021, the firm merged with New York-based Pivotal Planning Group, the first time two Dynasty RIAs combined.

Fiore said Kirkpatrick’s hiring kicks off what he expects to be a strong year for Procyon.

‘We’ll celebrate seven years in June,’ he told Citywire. ‘I really believe ‘24 could be one of our breakout years. Not only from an organic growth standpoint, but inorganically, too. The pipeline is certainly robust.’

When I succeeded Alex Rosenberg as editor of Citywire RIA, I admit that one of the things that made me nervous about the role was the annual 50 Growers Across America report, which was his brainchild and had been his pride and joy since 2020.

Alex crunched the numbers we got from Discovery Data himself, creating a hefty Excel file that would frequently crash my laptop when I tried to open it. But as we got to work on this year’s 50 Growers project, I found out that my fears were largely unjustified. Sorting through the data to identify the fastest-growing firms in each state wasn’t a chore. In fact, it was pretty darn fun. As you read on, you’re guaranteed to find names both familiar (Creative Planning, Procyon Partners, Moneta Group) and unfamiliar (like Geometric Wealth Advisors, the RIA in Washington, D.C. that specializes in working with partners at Bain, McKinsey and BCG). The project got my team and I talking to RIAs all around the country. I’m happy to say we learned a lot. One fear was unfortunately realized: this year’s Excel file was, once again, a laptop crasher. Allow me to give you a brief refresher on how this project works before you dive into our interactive map. We use historical Form ADV data compiled for us by Discovery Data, then we run it through a layer of screens. We screen out RIAs that don’t include financial planning as one of their core services, as well as firms that are offshoots of broker-dealers and banks (firms whose advisors may be dually registered with a broker-dealer but maintain their own RIA entity are in bounds). Lastly, we screen out firms that primarily function as back-end service providers for advisory teams. Once we’ve done all that, we look at the eligible firms’ performance in 2022 across three categories: percentage growth in AUM, monetary growth in AUM, and percentage growth in employees. We crunch those numbers into a single figure known as the ‘growth factor’: the end result is what you can see here. As you’ll see, the competition is tougher in some states (New York, California, Texas) than in others (North Dakota, Hawaii). We take pride in our legwork on this: We reach out to firms for this report, they don’t contact us. Firms may not want to appear on this list (we have had angry emails in the past), but the numbers are the numbers. No one is paid or compensated for their appearance, nor are we. It’s all based on cold, hard numbers (which is particularly appealing for a statistics-obsessed baseball fan like myself). Deputy editor Andrew Foerch, senior reporters Sam Bojarski and Payton Guion, and myself reached out to every single firm that topped the list in each state. As you’ll see, not everyone was particularly eager to talk. But we did our best to give you a little bit of insight into how these firms tick and what might be behind their growth. Lastly, I’d be remiss if I didn’t thank Discovery Data for their assistance, as well as our former Citywire colleague Lara Mullen, who put together the laptop-crashing Excel document. Most importantly, I’d like to thank you for reading.

Ian Wenik

Jerry Sneed, Christopher Sneed and Frank McKiernan join from Baker Tilly Wealth Management.

By Alex Padalka|June 30, 2023

Procyon Partners announced that it has added two financial advisors who will work in the New York and Massachusetts areas.

Jerry Sneed and Frank McKiernan come to Procyon from Baker Tilly Wealth Management, where they managed a total of more $600 million for high-net-worth individuals and families, according to Procyon, part of the Dynasty Financial Partners network.

The advisors had served as executive managing directors and co-heads of Baker Tilly’s wealth division, Procyon said.

Sneed joined the financial services industry in 2009, registering with Metlife Securities in Hingham, Massachusetts, and had stints at Credit SuisseAXA Advisors and Merrill Lynch before joining Baker Tilly in 2021, according to BrokerCheck.

McKiernan began his industry career in 2014, at Credit Suisse in New York, and worked at Morgan Stanley and Merrill before joining Baker Tilly in 2021, according to his BrokerCheck profile.

They’re joined at Procyon by financial advisor Christopher Sneed and client associates Amanda DiGuiseppe and Emily Demers, according to the firm.

Procyon said that, with the new arrivals, it has added more than $1.5 billion in client assets over the past two years. It now manages about $5 billion in client assets from offices in New York, Connecticut, Maryland, Tennessee, Florida and Virginia, according to the firm.

 

 

Disclosure: This e-mail message, including any attachments, from Dynasty Financial Partners LLC (d/b/a Dynasty) or Dynasty Wealth Management LLC, a subsidiary of Dynasty, and registered investment advisor, or one of Dynasty’s affiliated subsidiaries, as indicated herein, is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed. This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail along with any attachments from your system. Thank you. *Dynasty Securities LLC is a limited purpose broker-dealer and functions as a paymaster in order to receive and pay commissions or transaction based revenues to and from third-parties in the following product lines: (a) Broker retailing corporate equity securities; (b) Broker retailing corporate debt securities; (c) Mutual fund retailer; (d) Private placement of securities; (e) Broker selling variable life insurance and annuities; (f) Broker selling interests in unregistered private investments.

The team of advisors joining the group used to run more than $600 million of client money.

Procyon Partners announced yesterday that advisors Frank J McKiernan and Jerry R Sneed have joined the firm, each as a senior private wealth advisor.

Together, they previously managed over $600 million in assets for high net worth individuals and families at Baker Tilly Wealth Management. The team will work in the New York and Massachusetts areas. Procyon works with Dynasty Financial Partners.

The business is headquartered in Connecticut with offices in New York City, Long Island, Maryland, Tennessee, West Palm Beach, and Virginia Beach. The firm manages more than $5 billion in client assets.

Besides McKiernan and Sneed, the following team members will join Procyon:

—  Christopher Sneed, financial advisor;
—  Amanda DiGuiseppe, client service associate; and
—  Emily Demers, client service associate.

Procyon Partners has added a number of advisors to its ranks, starting with the recruitment of the Pivotal Planning Group in May 2021.

Frank McKiernan and Jerry Sneed are joining Procyon, a Dynasty Financial network firm, from Baker Tilly Wealth Management.

June 27, 2023 By Bruce Kelly

Procyon Partners, with almost $5 billion in assets, said Tuesday said it had added two financial advisors, Frank McKiernan and Jerry Sneed, who managed $600 million in client assets. 

McKiernan and Sneed are joining Connecticut-based Procyon as senior vice presidents and senior private wealth advisors.

Both had been registered as both brokers and investment advisors at Baker Tilly Wealth Management since 2021, according to their BrokerCheck profiles, and before that at Merrill Lynch. They will work in the New York and Massachusetts areas.

In addition to McKiernan and Sneed, the following people will also be joining Procyon: financial advisor Christopher Sneed and Amanda DiGuiseppe and Emily Demers, both client service associates. 

Procyon is a Dynasty Financial Partners network firm.

Related Topics: Dynasty Financial, Procyon Partners

The advisory team, which will work out of New York City, is led by Frank McKiernan and Jerry Sneed.

BY SAM BOJARSKI

A Dynasty Financial Partners-backed RIA in Connecticut has picked up a five-person advisory team from Baker Tilly.

The team, led by Frank McKiernan and Jerry Sneed, managed over $600m in assets and joins Shelton-based Procyon Partners, according to Dynasty. Both advisors will assume the title of senior vice president and private wealth advisor at Procyon.

They are joined by Jerry’s son, advisor Christopher Sneed, along with two client service associates: Amanda DiGuiseppe and Emily Demers.

‘I focus mostly on the high net worth to ultra-high net worth space,’ McKiernan told Citywire. ‘Most are private company CEOs, serial entrepreneurs or families with significant generational wealth.’

The team, which left Baker Tilly Wealth Management last week, started on Monday, McKiernan said. A $3.9bn RIA, Baker Tilly Wealth Management is controlled by the accounting firm Baker Tilly US, according to regulatory disclosures.

‘We got a real window into what it meant to be fully independent in the quasi-independence world,’ McKiernan said. ‘The move is something we thought was best for the client-advisor experience.’

McKiernan and Jerry Sneed helped lead the Baker Tilly advisory practice as executive managing directors, according to the company’s website.

They both registered with Baker Tilly in 2021, after working for about two years at broker-dealer Merrill Lynch.

The advisors will have a path to equity in Procyon, said Phil Fiore, chief executive of the $4.9bn RIA. They will work out of the firm’s New York City office, he added, joining Procyon managing director Jim Jeffery.

‘It’s a young team, and what’s great is we have some young partners already,’ Fiore said. ‘I see the next generation of Procyon being built right before our eyes.’

Procyon, which is majority-owned by its employees, joined middle- and back-office service provider Dynasty in 2017. In the first ever merger of Dynasty RIAs, Procyon merged with New York-based Pivotal Planning Group in 2021.

Since then, Procyon has added five advisory teams, including the recent team from Baker Tilly, according to Dynasty.

Baker Tilly did not respond to a request for comment.

Disclosure: This e-mail message, including any attachments, from Dynasty Financial Partners LLC (d/b/a Dynasty) or Dynasty Wealth Management LLC, a subsidiary of Dynasty, and registered investment advisor, or one of Dynasty’s affiliated subsidiaries, as indicated herein, is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed. This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail along with any attachments from your system. Thank you. *Dynasty Securities LLC is a limited purpose broker-dealer and functions as a paymaster in order to receive and pay commissions or transaction based revenues to and from third-parties in the following product lines: (a) Broker retailing corporate equity securities; (b) Broker retailing corporate debt securities; (c) Mutual fund retailer; (d) Private placement of securities; (e) Broker selling variable life insurance and annuities; (f) Broker selling interests in unregistered private investments.